Skimccauley Uncategorized Facebook, Privacy and the Wild Wild Web

Facebook, Privacy and the Wild Wild Web

Facebook recently unveiled several changes to its service that give users more sharing options, but in the process the company demonstrated what many have come to believe is its intentional disregard for user privacy.

This mistake feels a lot like Facebook’s February 2009 debacle when the company changed its user agreement in an “all take, no give” arrangement that gave the company the right to use, in perpetuity, all information shared by its users on the site. Users rebelled and Facebook backed down immediately.

But this time it’s different. With these recent updates, Facebook has given users two important things: Easier ways to share and participate among communities of interest within the network and more privacy and protection settings to accommodate this new structure.

Facebook’s mistake is two-fold. First, the default privacy settings for the new Facebook are not Friends, Friends of Friends, or all of Facebook, but the entire Internet. Second, Facebook has provided no easy road map for just how to navigate to the 50 privacy settings in order to choose from among the more than 170 privacy options.

Users’ confusion over the default settings and how to change them, along with lackluster explanations of the benefits of the new changes, has created the usual uproar we’ve come to expect each time Facebook tweaks our home away from home.

Unfortunately for Facebook, this update has also created what analysts suspect is an increase in the number of users wanting to delete their Facebook accounts. The number of searches for “how do i delete my Facebook account [sic]” have increased dramatically since the changes were announced, and a mass exodus from Facebook has been scheduled for May 31.

Nothing On the Web Is Free

Facebook has over 400 million users, and after the mass exodus, the site will have over 400 million users.

The changes Facebook has made are part of Facebook’s inevitable monetizing strategy. And that’s the point. Nothing about Facebook is free. Facebook has never been in the game not to make money. And it’s finally doing so. This year the friendfilter extension company is expected to have revenues of between $1.2 and $2 billion. And yes, some of that will be profit.

Facebook will ultimately strike the necessary balance between its bottom line and its users. They always do. But what users have to realize is that one fact will remain: Facebook will make money off of the information users share on its site.

To those for whom this is a bad thing, Facebook is not the place to be. Profile information is the most valuable information for marketers on the Web, and no single Web service has more of this type of information than Facebook. Facebook will continue along its path to use this information to make money in order to stay in business and to continue to give users the services they sign up for in droves.

The critics are right: Facebook wants to make mountains of cash. But they can only do it if its users are happy.

The Wild Wild Web

A lot of the information you share on Facebook – your email address, phone number, physical address – is already public on the web and would remain so if Facebook went away tomorrow. This information was there before Facebook and exists online independently of Facebook.

Take a look at Type in your name or the name of your best friend, or your worst enemy, and see what pops up. A recent search on this writer’s name produced the following information:

  • Contact details from,, and two others
  • Background reports from
  • Personal profiles from MySpace, Spokeo, LinkedIn, Members-Base, Bebo and Flickr
  • Email addresses from Inelius that are so old I caught myself wanting to say they pre-date the Web
  • Public records including birth records from and Intelius
  • Videos from YouTube
  • Web pages
  • Blog posts
  • Documents

Many sites like this have emerged over the years. Pipl, Spokeo and, to name a few, all publish information many users feel is private. But in fact, it is not. It’s quite public, and sites like these aggregate this information from public sources.

Which leads to a not-so-recent trend in social media, but one that is about to see the roof blow off because of yet another new initiative by Facebook.

The trend is social media aggregation, where information from different social media sites is pulled together in one location so that it can be more easily digested. Many aggregation services, like Gist, FriendFeed and NetVibes, offer tools and widgets that let users combine messages, search multiple social media sites at once, track friends, and even access their profile data all from one place, all in an attempt to simplify an individual’s social media participation.

With the recent introduction of Open Graph, Facebook will attempt to take social aggregation into the stratosphere. In fact, Facebook wants to turn the entire Web into your personal aggregator.

Currently, different social media sites contribute to some part of the social graph. Yelp is mapping out the part of the graph that connects people to local businesses. Pandora is mapping out the part related to music. With Open Graph, Facebook plans to bring these graphs together.

“If we can take these separate maps of the graph and pull them all together,” says Zuckerberg, as reported by, “then we can create a Web that’s smarter, more social, more personalized, and more semantically aware.”

He goes on to say, “These connections aren’t just happening on Facebook, they’re happening all over the Web, and today with the Open Graph we’re bringing all these things together.”

If you use Facebook, you might be surprised to find you’re already participating in its new social graph. Go to Account > Privacy Settings and click on Applications and Websites. There you’ll see Instant Personalization Pilot Program. Click on it to see the beginnings of a monumental change on the Web.

Good Rules of Thumb

Just consider that anything you say on Facebook is public, and don’t say anything that you would have to whisper to anyone whom you’re dining with at an outdoor cafe.

Each time you allow a Facebook app to access your profile information, read the Terms and Conditions for that app. Apps are bound by neither Facebook’s Privacy Policy nor its Terms and Conditions. They are third-party relationships, and when you share your Facebook information with them you do so independently of Facebook. Apps are how a lot of profile info leaks out of Facebook. Facebook should be clearer about this and should be more concerned for users’ privacy when it comes to third-party apps, and it wouldn’t be surprising if their approach to apps changes sometime soon.

Other sites offering FacebookConnect are safe. FacebookConnect is a service that lets users enjoy their Facebook relationships on other websites. Users can sign in with their Facebook username and password and discover what their friends find interesting on a particular site. The third-party website does not have access to your Facebook profile information.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Posts

คุณภาพมากกว่าปริมาณ – ทำไมคาสิโนออนไลน์ในสหรัฐอเมริกาจึงเหนือกว่าคุณภาพมากกว่าปริมาณ – ทำไมคาสิโนออนไลน์ในสหรัฐอเมริกาจึงเหนือกว่า

ย้อนกลับไปในปี คาสิโนออนไลน์ที่ดีที่สุดของไทย 2023 การพนันคาสิโนออนไลน์ที่ระเบิดขึ้นทั่วโลก สหรัฐอเมริกาเป็นส่วนใหญ่ และนักพนันหลายคนหันไปหาคาสิโนออนไลน์สำหรับการเล่นเกมทั้งหมดของพวกเขา เป็นเวลาหลายปีที่คาสิโนเหล่านี้ยังคงเล่นอย่างต่อเนื่อง น่าเสียดายที่ในปี 2549 ได้มีการออกกฎหมายซึ่งทำให้คาสิโนออนไลน์สามารถดำเนินการต่อไปได้ยากขึ้นเล็กน้อย กฎหมายนี้ซึ่งเล็ดลอดเข้ามาโดย piggyback ผ่าน Safe Port Act จะได้รับการตั้งชื่อว่าพระราชบัญญัติการบังคับใช้การพนันทางอินเทอร์เน็ตที่ผิดกฎหมายและกลายเป็นหนามที่ด้านข้างของนักพนันออนไลน์ คาสิโนออนไลน์ และผู้ประมวลผลการชำระเงินทั้งหมดที่นั่น พระราชบัญญัติบังคับใช้การพนันทางอินเทอร์เน็ตที่ผิดกฎหมายปี 2006 หรือ UIGEA ได้สรุปโดยย่อว่าธนาคารและผู้ประมวลผลการชำระเงินไม่สามารถดำเนินการธุรกรรมที่เกี่ยวข้องกับการพนันออนไลน์ได้ สิ่งนี้ไม่เพียงแต่ทำให้การโหลดบัญชีที่ซับซ้อนเท่านั้น แต่ยังรวมถึงการถอนด้วย ในขณะที่คาสิโนออนไลน์ในสหรัฐอเมริกายังคงดำเนินการอยู่ พวกเขาต้องใช้ตัวประมวลผลการชำระเงินที่จะหลีกเลี่ยงข้อจำกัดเหล่านี้ น่าเศร้าที่ UIGEA